Moritz Heepe: Todesstrafe und natŸrliche
Individualrecht in der Rechtsphilosophie der europŠischen AufklŠurng vor Kant
Abstract: This study analyses the
development of the relation between natural rights theories and the moral
valuation of capital punishment in the European enlightenment up to Beccaria.
The theories of Grotius, Hobbes and Cumberland are three eminent theoretical options
in early modern natural law theory. In different ways they all approved capital
punishment: Grotius proposed that the criminal forfeited his right to life
through his criminal deed qua implicit consent or reciprocity. Hobbes saw the
individual right to life of the citizen as finally not binding for the state.
And in CumberlandÕs sight the right to live was only conditional on its
maximizing effect on the collective welfare as he understood it. It was not
until Beccaria published his famous book on crime and punishment that an
enlightened natural law author rejected the legitimacy of the death penalty.
BeccariaÕs arguments concerning capital punishment are investigated in this
study in the light of the foregoing debate based on natural rights.
¯
zurŸck zur homepage
¯
zurŸck zum Gesamtinhaltsverzeichnis