Michael Zywietz: Komponisten als Analytiker
Since musicological discourse is impossible without the aid of analysis,
a composerÕs own analyses are preeminent documents of music history. The
examples chosen here, ranging from the seventeenth to the twentieth century,
illustrate an understanding of analysis that intentionally goes beyond a
technical analysis in the strictest sense. The issue of subjective
interpretation is prominent in the musical analyses of Burmeister, Mattheson,
Liszt, and Lachenmann. The frequent criticism that music theory lags behind
compositional technique does not apply to the analysing composer. It becomes
evident that these four composers follow a tradition of analysis geared towards
extra-musical elements; they deliberately use subjective approaches and methods
that stand in obvious contrast to a practice that entertains the illusion of
objectivity based on scientific criteria. Their methods reveal that analysis is
also possible and meaningful beyond the conventional definition of parameters
like harmony and motives, etc. in that they offer clearer contours to the
distinctive features belonging to musicological interpretation.
¯
zurŸck zur homepage
¯
zurŸck zum Gesamtinhaltsverzeichnis