Michal
Chvojka
Between
Conspiracy and Revolution Genesis
and Consequences of the 1846 Revolution in Cracow und Galicia
Perception
und Range of Action of the Habsburg Police
The essay
is concerned with the genesis and the consequences of the revolution in Cracow
and Galicia in 1846 and with the reflections and counteractions of the Habsburg
state police. Based on archive materials from Brno and Vienna, the author
analyzes both the police precautions against the revolutionary propaganda and
activities in the Polish parts of the Habsburg Monarchy as well as the responsibilities
of the Police Court Office in Vienna with respect to the revolutionary outbreak
of 1846.
After the
revolution of 1830/31 in the Russian parts of Poland (the so-called ÒCongress
PolandÓ) had been suppressed, Polish emigrants (especially in France and
Belgium) developed a very intense activity to reestablish the former Polish
Kingdom by sending emissaries, publishing pamphlets, manifestos and appeals,
and especially by the means of secret societies and associations. During the
1830s, however, the Habsburg police authorities (the Police Directorate in
Lemberg/Lwiw and the Police Court Office in Vienna) managed to control and
neutralize such underground activities thanks to the persistent confidential
network of Baron Leopold Sacher-Masoch, and possessed extensive information
about the character, range and leaders of the impending revolutionary outbreak.
Rising numbers of imprisoned revolutionaries and legal proceedings against them
as well as the successful elimination of the Przemyśl conspiracy at the
beginning of 1840s confirm this assertion. On the other side, Austrian police
had not been able to prevent new and new emissaries from entering Galicia and
to forestall the forbidden revolutionary prints to be smuggled there. Moreover,
especially in military and security matters, there were striking differences
between the Civil and Military Governor, archduke Ferdinand, and police chiefs
Sacher-Masoch in Lemberg and Count Sedlnitzky in Vienna, which made an
efficient upheaval prevention far more difficult.
Post-revolutionary
actions and measures of the Habsburg authorities demonstrate their clear
inability to champion substantial reforms (especially the removal of corvŽes),
despite tendencies to restrict the judicial powers of local landlords through
establishing imperial districts as institutions of first judicial instance in
Galicia. The Police took both preventive (strict passport and foreigner
control) as well as repressive (imprisonment of revolutionaries and passing of
trials) measures, while Count SedlnitzkyÕs attempts to establish a gendarmerie
in Galicia had been delayed by administrative reforms. On such a basis, and
especially after receiving reports on a widespread dissatisfaction among
peasants and noblemen alike, the desired long-term safeguarding of order and
security could not be established.
>>
zurŸck zum Inhaltsverzeichnis des Bandes