Sudhoffs Archiv

Zeitschrift fŸr Wissenschaftsgeschichte

 

 

¥ zurŸck zur Stammseite

¥ Inhalt des letzten Heftes

¥ geplante BeitrŠge

¥ Gesamtinhaltsverzeichnis

¥ Beihefte

¥ bestellen

 

 

 

 

Zusammenfassungen / Abstracs (Band 85 / 2001 bis Band 87 / 2003)

                                                                                         

Markus Asper: Mathematik, Milieu, Text. Die frŸhgriechische(n) Mathematik(en) und ihr Umfeld (Band 87, S. 1)

Greek theoretical mathematics emerges among sixth-century Ionians from a background of professional practitioners, concerned chiefly with arithmetical operations. Its characteristical features (impersonalization, standardization, diagrams) develop as part of an elitist play of distinction at fifth- and fourth-century Athens, mainly to ascertain the tradition of that knowledge without adequate institutions. Sophists challenge the mathematiciansÕ practices, philosophers adopt the mathematiciansÕ knowledge as a model of truth, but the mathematicians themselves remain autonomous. Even hellenistic mathematics, semi-institutionalized at royal courts, is little more than a private affair of a narrow circle of intellectuals. All this time the practitionersÕ traditions persist basically unaltered and constantly present the theoreticians with a social and epistemic background to differentiate "their" mathematics from. Finally, these two branches of Greek mathematics, a practical and a theoretical one, are describable as reciprocally systematized forms of knowledge.

Nimrod Bar-Am: A Framework for a Critical History of Logic (Band 87, S. 80)

Im Mittelpunkt der traditionellen Logik steht die traditionelle Frage: Was ist eine begrŸndete Folgerung? Die moderne Logik tat ihre ersten Schritte mit der Kritik dieser Frage (Hume, Bolzano und Boole) und mit dem Ersatz dieser Frage durch diemoderne Frage: Was ist eine berechtigte Folgerung? (Boole, Russell und Tarski). BetrŠchtlicher Fortschritt wurde auch von jenen gemacht, die sich nicht fŸr eine der zwei Fragestellungen entscheiden konnten (Whewell, Frege).

Thomas Beddies und Heinz-Peter Schmiedebach: Die Diskussion um die Šrztlich beaufsichtigte Familenpflege in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung einer Ma§nahme zur sozialen Integration psychisch Kranker (Band 85, S. 82)

This article is based on the thesis that family care in the 20th century was practiced mainly under pragmatical/economical and therapeutical aspects. Depending on time and place, one of the two aspects would dominate while the other would serve as supporting motive. The subject of this article is to examine selected models of family care in Germany at different times as to their aim regarding the social integration of psychiatric patients. The family care patients not only lived outside the psychiatric hospitals, but were usually employed in household, farming or trade of the foster home. So the integrative potential of family care was, and still is, aimed at establishing a living and working condition as "normal" as possible. Until 1945, patients who could not or were not allowed to return to a completly independent lifestyle, family care offered them the widest range of integration and freedom. The often observed longlasting stays in families, reflect this rise in quality of life, although many were formally still associated with the mental institution. Up to the fifties, family care can be evaluated as an attempt of psychiatric hospitals to encounter the social isolation of the mentally ill. Nowadays family care is seeing a certain renaissance as part of social psychiatry. It is however not always clear whether family care can serve as a mean of real integration in the sense of a completely independent living and working condition, or whether it leads only to an, even if permanent, extramural accomodation of the chronically ill patients.

Gštz Borgwardt: Bernhard Schapiro - Ein orthodoxer Jude als frŸher Androloge im 20. Jahrhundert (Band 86, S. 27)

The unusual history and professional background of one of the first andrologists is reported. Bernhard Schapiro, born in 1888 in Dvinsk in Latvia, then a city in the Russian Pale of Settlements for Jews, grew up as an orthodox (hassidic) Jew receiving exclusively talmudic lessons until he was 18 years old. During the final years of this period of life he was educated at the famous Slobodka Talmud Academy Kenesset Israel in Kovno where he absorbed the ideals of Musar-doctrines, thus being influenced for the rest of his life. The Rogachover Gaon J. Rozin supported his desire to study medicine. After a brief stay in Frankfurt/Main he acquired by own efforts the necessary general knowledge to matriculate for access to university. Medical studies at Zurich University (1913—1919) were followed by a one-year-internship at a dermatologic department in Breslau/Silesia. The thesis for his doctorate at Zurich University in 1920 was on âRelations between Nodular Erythema and TuberculosisÔ. He spent two years training in dermatology at Breslau University under Jadassohn. Back in Berlin, he married and had four children, while he worked at Magnus HirschfeldÕs Institute for Sexual Sciences. After initial clinical studies in venerology he more and more turned to andrological problems, including treatment of underdeveloped male genitals, premature ejaculation and impotence in general. In this context he tested the new drug Praehormon and developed the two remedies Testifortan and Praejaculin. He was the first to describe the effect of anterior pituitary lobe hormone on the descent of cryptorchid testicles, thus initiating a treatment modality still in motion today. When Hitler came to power he and his family were spared as Swiss citizens, but he lost his base for working after the Institute was looted. He established an andrologic practice at Zurich. What he had witnessed in Germany caused him to set up a Swiss branch of Mizrachi, the spiritually based center of Zionism in Switzerland. He left Europe in 1940 for New York/USA. After compulsory repetition of medical exams in a new language he managed to establish a new existence as andrologist. His practice flourished, the more as he was trusted to treat Jewish patients according to Jewish Law. The decisive step brought him to Jerusalem, in 1951, where he founded and headed an Endocrinologic Department of the University, pursuing andrologic questions, until his death on December 31, 1966. What actually controlled his life can be read on his tombstone: âHe remained a pupil of Slobodka all the days of his lifeÔ.

Ralf Broer und Ralf Hofheinz: GesundheitspŠdagogik statt Tršstung: Die theologische BewŠltigung von Krankheit bei Philipp Melanchthon und Caspar Peucer (Band 85, S. 18)

Subject of this paper is the interpretation of disease as physical evil (malum physicum) by the university professors Philipp Melanchthon (1497—1560) and Caspar Peucer (1525—1602) at Protestant Wittenberg. Melanchthon and Peucer settled the problem of theodicy principally by theological strategies of moralization and compensation. In most cases, therefore, disease resulted from inadequate health behavior, especially drunkenness, furthermore from disdain for medicine and obstruction of divine healing. As a rule, natural factors (e.g. celestial bodies or human affections) only contributed to disease. In general it was caused by free will. In consequence the strategies of depotentiation and functionalization of disease became insignificant resulting in the accentuation of its evil nature. By way of compensation Melanchthon and Peucer stressed the Divine healing of disease. God created the natural remedies and later He created the medical arts by granting heroic virtue to the greatest doctors (Hippocrates, Galen, Avicenna). Moreover the divine Trinity could directly harmonize affections. Thus, God incited a psychosomatical healing within the human organism. As far as physical evil is concerned Lutheran pathology substituted medieval pessimism for therapeutical optimism. Melanchthon and Peucer strived to discipline the patientsÕ behavior and to legitimate the medical arts by God. In this sense their pathology formed part of a program of social and religious stabilization. The academic medicine profited greatly from that program in later years.

Wolfgang Burgmair und Matthias M. Weber: "Éda§ er selbst mit aller Energie gegen diese Hallucinationen ankŠmpfen mu§ É" Kšnig Otto von Bayern und die MŸnchner Psychiatrie um 1900 (Band 86, S. 27)

King Otto of Bavaria (1848–1916), brother of "Dreamking" Ludwig II., had suffered from a severe psychiatric disorder since he was an adolescent. According to court manners of the time the psychopathological symptoms were at first neglected. After a public scandal in 1875 Otto was treated by the Munich psychiatrist Bernhard von Gudden who used a variety of methods. These changing therapeutic measures reflected the scientific development of psychiatry during the second half of the 19th century. Since 1879 Otto, together with his princely household, was put into FŸrstenried Castle near Munich where the so-called "PrinzenŠrzte" took over responsibility for medical care. In FŸrstenried, the neuropathologist Franz Nissl, who served as OttoÕs "Prinzenarzt" from 1885 to 1887, brought into perfection his famous staining methods for neuronal tissue. Despite his mental incapacity Otto was proclaimed king of Bavaria after the dreamkingsÕs death in 1886. The close connection between the "High Patient" and his doctors strengthened the social position of psychiatry as a public task.

Stefan Deschauer: Zur DurchfŸhrung der Neunerprobe in frŸhen deutschen RechenbŸchern (Band 85, S. 129)

To the arithmetical traditions of even the early German RechenbŸcher (here analysed till approximately 1530) there always belongs the "nines check" after written addition and multiplication.

There are numerous modern publications on the history of arithmetic that inter alia treat the nines check; but, curiously, they never completely explain the method of the early German Rechenmeister. We particularly miss insights into the determination of the excesses of nines. What was the method?

Comparative studies of the sources show that in this check the sum of the digits is not the most important point.

Thomas Falmagne: Un nouveau tŽmoin de lÕÜApex phisice anonymiÝ (ou ÜDe philosophia et eius secretisÝ): le manuscrit Bruxelles, B.R. II 3308 provenant de lÕabbaye cistercienne de Villers-en-Brabant (Band 87, S. 69)

1970 veršffentlichte Marie-Odile Garrigues einen Artikel, den sie den Oeuvre des sogenannten Honorius Augustodunensis gewidmet hat. 1975 konzentrierte sie sich auf einem Text der natŸrlichen Philosophie: der ÜApex physiceÝ. Dieser Text, welche bis dahin nur in drei Handschriften bekannt war, wurde 1994 und 1999 von Hans Lemke und Gregor Maurach in zwei Lieferungen herausgegeben. Dieser Beitrag hatte das Ziel, eine neue  Handschrift BrŸssel, B.R. II 3308 an das Tageslicht zu bringen. Diese Handschrift wird auf 1200 oder auf das erste Viertel des 13. Jh. datiert und kommt aus der zisterziensischen Abtei von Villers-en-Brabant. Die Handschrift Ÿberlebte den Brand und scheint eine vollstŠndige Kopie des ÜApex phisiceÝ bewahrt zu haben. Das Feuer am Rande des erstes Blattes macht den Titel und den Namen des Autors unkenntlich, die eventuell vielleicht noch kopiert worden wŠren und daher fehlt ein wesentlicher Teil fŸr die Bestimmung dieses enzyklopŠdischen Textes. Das Datum der Kopie (gegen 1200 oder im ersten Viertel vom 13. Jh.) setzt diese Handschrift aus Villers (B) in einen interessanten chronologischen Zusammenhang, nŠmlich genau zwischen die beiden Handschriften aus dem Vatikan (V) und aus Trier (H). Die philologische Analyse, deren Ergebnisse in der Anlage beiliegen, lЧt au§erdem nicht die BestŠtigung der Annahme einer Verbindung zwischen der Handschrift aus Villers-en-Brabant mit dem kulturellen Kreis von Trier, aus dem H. hervorzugehen scheint, zu. Eher scheint die andere Hypothese bestŠtigt zu sein, die in B eine verwandte Handschrift von V sieht.

 

Menso Folkerts: Eine Verwechslung mit Folgen. Die Humanisten Acronius und Atrocinus (Band 85, S. 55)

In all modern bibliographic works the humanists Acronius and Atrocianus are treated as one person. But this article proves that there were three different scholars carrying these names:

1) Johannes Atrocianus (I) from Ravensburg, who matriculated in Basel in 1513/14 and later became a school-teacher there.

2) Johannes Atrocianus (II) from Colmar, who matriculated in Freiburg/Breisgau in 1543 and later became professor of Latin there.

3) Johannes Acronius from Akkrum (West Friesland), who matriculated in 1542 in Basel and later became professor of mathematics and logic there. He died in 1564.

In the article all available information about the life and works of each of these three humanists is given and it is shown that the erroneous identification started with J. W. HerzogÕs Athenae Rauricae (1778), which comprises a list of professors at the University of Basel.

Rainer Fortner und Dominik Gro§: Egas Moniz und die Leukotomie-Debatte unter besonderer BerŸcksichtigung des portugiesischsprachigen (Band 86, S.138)

Although the practice of psychosurgery had already been induced in 1888 by the Swiss psychiatrist Gottlieb Burckhardt, the most widely practiced form of psychiatric surgery — the so-called âlobotomyÔ — was first performed in 1935 by the Portuguese neurologist Egas Moniz (1874—1955). Although the reaction to his intervention was mixed, Moniz was awarded the Nobel Price for his work in 1949.

The present article concentrates on both the Portuguese and the international preception of MonizÔ lobotomy and its apparent ethical implications. One particularly important question that MonizÕs work brings to the fore concerns the role of psychosurgery in contemporary psychiatry and — consequently — the role of the spirit of the age in judging psychosurgical interventions. Therefore the early reactions to lobotomy are opposed to recent and actual statements in and outside Iberia.

Andreas Frewer und Yvonne Steif: Personen, Netzwerke und Institutionen: Zur GrŸndung der Deutschen Gesellschaft fŸr Geschichte der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften (Band 87, S. 180)

In what way did the process of founding the "Deutsche Gesellschaft fŸr Geschichte der Medizin und Naturwissenschaften" (1901), the worldÕs oldest society for the history of sciencedevelop? This article combines approaches of the historiography of institutions with concepts focusing on individual persons. During the early period of the process August Hirsch and Theodor Puschmann were the most relevant scientists. The history of the "Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und €rzte" (GDN€) and their annual meetings mirror the difficult connection of medical history and medical geography or tropical medicine. It was the special ability of Karl Sudhoff to create networks which led to the of emancipation and foundation of the DGGMN; nevertheless, the preliminary work of scientists like Hendrik Peypers, Felix von Oefele, Georg Kahlbaum, Julius Pagel or Max Neuburger and others musnÕt be forgotten when analysing the crucial years for around 1900. Sudhoff was the dominant personality then; different conceptions of the new discipline in addition to some severe conflicts are documented by newly found manuscripts and correspondences.

Martina Giese: Zur lateinischen †berlieferung von Burgundios Wein- und Gottfrieds Pelzbuch (Band 87, S. 195)

In this paper, the Latin manuscripts of two main works of the medieval Fachprosa on viniculture, horticulture, and grafting are analysed. In addition to the six that are generally known, four new manuscripts of the Liber de vindemiis of Burgundio of Pisa (  1193) are presented. This treatise, consisting mainly of a translation of extracts from the Greek Geoponika, was used by Petrus de Crescentiis and by Geoffrey of Franconia for his so-called "Pelzbuch", a book on trees and wine. Due to the recent evaluation of 46 new manuscripts, the total number of Latin codices increases to 84. This means that there are almost as many Latin manuscripts as there are codices of the German translation. The fact that the three oldest manuscripts date from around 1300 contradicts the commonly accepted view that Geoffrey wrote his tract in the middle of the 14th century. Some of the newly discovered codices contain a short version of GeoffreyÕs tractatus, hitherto only known from incunabula (under the title "Tractatus de vino et eius proprietate"), which William of Hirnkofen used for his own work on wine in 1478.

Sebastia Giralt: El autor del Contra culculum y de otros tres tratados medicos: ÀArnau de Vilanova o Galvano da Levanto? (Band 87, S. 32)

Einige Handschriften, wie auch die Renaissance-Gesamtausgaben der medizinischen Schriften Arnalds von Vilanova (von der dritten Ausgabe an) enthalten vier Abhandlungen Ÿber spezifische Krankheiten: Regimen contra catarrum, De tremore cordis, De epilentia, Tractatus contra calculum. Ihre AuthentizitŠt innerhalb der Debatte Ÿber die sogenannte "Arnaldische Frage" wurde mehr oder weniger angenommen –: gemeint ist jene Debatte Ÿber die zahlreichen Probleme hinsichtlich der Autorschaft, die das unfangreiche Arnald zugeschriebene Werk begleiten. Die hier vorgelegte Studie befa§t sich mit der Autorschaft der erwŠhnten Texte unter dem neuen Aspekt, den die Kodizes des Arztes aus Genua Galvano da Levanto (1312 gestorben), einfŸhren. Bei den drei ersten handelt es sich in Wirklichkeit nur um eine AbkŸrzung der drei Werke von Galvano Remedium salutare contra catarrum, Carisma sanativum tremoris cordis, Liber salvatoris contra morbum caducum, wobei im wesentlichen die Kapitel Ÿber allgemeine Aspekte der Medizin weggelassen wurden, des weiteren diejenigen Krankheiten, die als "geistige" Leiden behandelt wurden. Im Falle von De epilentia wird der verkŸrzte Text in den Handschriften und im Druck mit anderen kleineren Schriften Ÿber die Epilepsie kombiniert. Einer davon kšnnte ein authentisches Werk von Arnalds sein. Andererseits fŸhren alle Anzeichen zu der Schlu§folgerung, da§ Contra calculum derselbe Traktat ist wie der Bonifaz VIII, anlЧlich dessen Gallenstein-Krankheit gewidmeten Liber Manus Dei contra calculosum languorem. Obwohl keine handschriftliche Galvano zugeschriebene Kopie bekannt ist, besteht eine betrŠchtliche Anzahl von Kriterien, die einstimmig auf den Genuesen als Autor dieses Werkes hinweisen. Gleichzeitig bestŠtigen sie seine Autorschaft der drei anderen hier umstrittenen Abhandlungen. Diese Kriterien sind: die Konsistenz der handschriftlichen Tradition, die †berschneidung von bestimmten Zitaten in diesen vier Texten und einigen anderen unzweifelhaft Galvano zugeschriebenen Schriften, die sprachliche †bereinstimmung in den verschiedenen Texten hinsichtlich eines sehr charakteristischen Stils, von buchstŠblich sich wiederholenden Stellen, von zahlreichen gemeinsamen Ideen, Strukturen und Quellen, sowie schlie§lich eine unverkennbare Mischung Šrztlicher und theologischer Themen und AusdrŸcke der in Frage stehenden Werke. Der Contra calculum-Traktat fŸgt sich auch kohŠrent in die hier versuchte Rekonstruktion der Laufbahn von Galvano, wobei dem Werk gegen Steinleiden offensichtlich eine besondere Rolle zukam beim Versuch, die Gunst und damit die UnterstŸtzung des Heiligen Vaters zu gewinnen.

 

Andrew Colin Gow: ,Sanguis NaturalisÔ and ,Sanc De MiracleÔ: Ancient Medicine, ,SuperstitionÔ and the Metaphysics of Medieval Healting Miracles (Band 87, S. 129)

Im Mittelalter galt Blut als besonders hochwertiges Mittel gegen Augenleiden, inkl. Augenwunden. Die GrŸnde dafŸr sind weder in der Schulmedizin noch in der sonst so dominanten Humoralpathologie zu suchen, sondern in einer ziemlich diffusen Tradition, in der antike Medizin und ÔmagischerÕ Glauben etwa gleichwertige Grš§en darstellen. Entgegen einem Hauptargument des bahnbrechenden russischen MediŠvisten Aron Gurevich kann somit festgestellt werden, da§ antike Traditionen nicht nur unter gebildeten Eliteschichten weitertradiert und bekannt waren, sondern unter viel breiteren Volksschichten das Leben, den Glauben und die Alltagspraxis beeinflu§ten. Zwar war die Herkunft solcher Ideen, meist eben aus altgriechischen und ršmischen Quellen, den gemeinen Frauen etwa, die laut Froissart das Blut von Gei§lern als Augenheilmittel priesen, nicht bekannt; doch verband sie eine lange Geschichte tradierten Wissens (z.B. durch Isidor, Bartholomaeus Anglicus u.a.) um das augenheilende Wirken von Blut mit Dioskurides, Celsus und anderen Medizinern des klassischen Altertums. Neu dagegen war ein kaum Ÿberraschender Hang zur Vermengung dieses Wissens mit den christlichen Tropen des Heiltums und des fromm betrachteten Wunders, wobei die augenheilende Kraft von Blut durch dessen geistige QualitŠten als Ausscheidung und Kommunikationsmittel (das Paradigma ist ja in der Messe vorgegeben) von MŠrtyrern, Heiligen oder sonst geistig erleuchteten Wesen vermutlich gesteigert wurde. Eine weitere Dimension erblickt man in den vielen Texten des Altertums (sowohl in der HebrŠischen Bibel wie etwa in der ÔOdysseeÕ oder ÔAeneisÕ), in denen Blut mit Seele oder Seelenkraft gleichgesetzt wird; wo Blut, Augen und Seele dann geballt als ÔAssoziationsbŸndelÕ auftreten, wird der hier angelegte †berblick Ÿber die antike Medizin, die christliche ÔWunderlogikÕ und viele textuelle Traditionen unerlЧlich, um diese verwickelten, der bisherigen medizinhistorischen Forschung undurchschaubaren (oder gar unsichtbaren!) Ideen und Texte zu deuten.

Joachim Jacoby: Die †bergie§ung mit Wasser - Hydrotherapeutische Vorschriften im SpŠtmittelalter (Band 86, S. 54)

Once identified, an illness is met or fought against by an appropriate therapy. The diverse use of water holds a significant place among the therapeutic means which had been developed in Western medicine ever since antiquity. The essay deals with one particular form of application, namely, the gush of water. Focus is laid on the period around 1500. As the relevant medical treatises are based directly on Greek or Roman authors (Hippocrate, Galen, Celsus) or are even commentaries of Arabic handbooks in their Latin translations (Avicenna, Rhazes), antique medicine inevitably had also to be taken into account. The pouring of water, alone or in combination with other prescriptions, was applicable in a variety of illnesses as fevers, pains of the joints, psychic diseases, or even headaches. To counteract the causes (or symptoms) of a disease the water quality could be adjusted by changing its temperature, by adding certain substances (oils, herb extracts or decoctions) or by varying the way of application. The gush of water could serve many purposes and was prescribed to sooth, to refrigerate, to stop a swelling, to widen pores, to shock the patient and even, given the underlying humoural conception of menÕs nature, to draw away humours from one part of the body to another. The water gush, hence, was not restricted to be used in the case of one particular illness only but was considered an almost general therapeutic means.

Gundolf Keil: Frugardi und die Tradition langobardischer Chirurgie (Band 86, S. 1)

The surgical manual âRogerinaÔ (âcyrurgiaÔ) of the Lombardic surgeon Roger Frugardi
(* before 1140 , + about 1195) belongs to the most-read texts in medieval Occident. This book laid the foundation for the species of the occidental surgical manuals and influenced them up to modern times. In addition, RogerÔs manual shows the literation of an segment of knowledge, that has been transmitted until then orally: Roger has completed the surgical knowledge with Salernitan experiences, he arranged it anatomically and presented it in a pathologic-traumatological systematization. This article describes the history of research of the âcyrurgiaÔ and analyzes to the last detail the later versions of the surgical manual: The addition of glosses by Roland of Parma, âAdditionesÔ, âChirurgia RolandinaÔ, âFirst Salernitan GlossÔ, âRoger Marginalia of ErfurtÔ, âFour Masters GlossÔ, âTherapeutic Roger GlossÔ, âChirurgia JamatiÔ and the widely extended Middle High German âRoger ComplexÔ. The authors demonstrate that Roger FrugardiÔs manual is in the tradition of the Germanic-Langobardic surgery.

Nikolai Korschunow:: €tiologie und Nosologie von "taubsucht" und "mania" in Paracelsischen Texten (Band 85, S. 175)

In this paper etiological and nosological concepts of the Renaissance medico, alchemist, philosopher, and theologist Theophrast von Hohenheim ("Paracelsus" (1493/94—1541)), concerning the "taubsucht [rage, fury]", the "mania", and contextual aspects, are shown. Paradigmatic oscillations between concepts of the present time and the views of Hohenheim are analyzed.

Four kinds of "taubsucht" are presented by Hohenheim in his earliest psychopathologically orientated treatise "Von der Taubsucht". Their relations towards later texts are described. He introduces many disorders in later texts, e.g. "mania", "lunatici", "ebricata", "phantasmata", "vihisch vernunft", that resemble aspects of the four kinds of "taubsucht".

Three main principles of etiology are documented and characterized as "theological-ethical", "elemental-sidereal", and "alchemistical".

Contrary to todayÕs preferred "descriptive" approach the main principle of Paracelsian classification is seen as "etiological-dimensional". Seven etiologic dimensions are described. Hierarchical correspondences between these dimensions are investigated. The seven dimensions are characterized as:

a)           Elemental influences (incorporation of psychotropic substances)

b)           Firmamental-sidereal influences (astrological and astronomical emanations)

c)           Spiritual influences (spirits deranging manÕs mind)

d)           Alchemistical ("chemical") influences

e)           Secondary diseases (caused by some pre-existing disorder)

f)            Intrinsic ethical and moral dispositions as the final cause of disorders (theological-ethical view)

g)           Heredity.

By evaluating the paradigmatic aspects of Hohenheims nosological approach, differences with todayÕs mainstream-views of psychiatry are seen in the field of "invisible" (spiritual and transcendental), "etiological-dimensional" explanations for the derangement of the mind (see b, c, f). Potential similarities are considered in the field of "visible" (materialistic), dimensions (see a, d, e, g).

It is concluded that Hohenheim strives towards an integration of spiritual and materialistic aspects in the application of etiological and nosological tools. Hohenheims concepts are summarized as a 16th century "integrative" psychopathological approach.

Daniel KŸgler und Hans-JŸrgen Holzhausen: Historische Entwicklung der Graduierung von malignen Weichgewebstumoren (Band 85, S. 45)

This article describes the historical development of the grading systems for malignant soft tissue tumors. First attempts to grade these tumors were made in the middle of the nineteenth century; a remarkable amount of activity in grading took place in the 1970s with an apex in the 1980s. Reviewing the literature back to the first available publications, five phases in the development of the grading systems for malignant soft tissue tumors could be distinguished: 1845—1919: phase of identification, 1927—1964: phase of description, 1965—1977: phase of predominant mitotic activity, 1979—1983: phase of predominant tumor type, from 1984: phase of multifactorial systems.

B.-A. Lamberg and Heikki Solin: The Thyroid gland in Anothomia Mundini and in the Commentaria of Berengarius (Band 86, S. 171)

Nach den alexandrinischen €rzten war es nicht mehr mšglich, Menschen zu sezieren, und wenn Anatomie studiert wurde, dann geschah dies bis Ende des 13. Jahrhunderts anhand von Tierkadavern — was selbstverstŠndlich nicht ausschlie§t, da§ chirurgisch erfahrene WundŠrzte wie Wilhelm von Saliceto und Heinrich von Mondeville aus ihren Operationserfahrungen auch etwas Ÿber die menschliche Anatomie in ihre LehrbŸcher einflie§en lassen konnten. Forensische Obduktionen wurden seit Ausgang des 13. Jahrhunderts durchgefŸhrt, denen auch Chirurgen beiwohnten. Im Jahr 316 hat dann der Bologneser Arzt und Anatom Mundinus Liucius (Mondino deÕ Liuzzi) seine — zunŠchst noch handschriftliche — ÔAnothomia MondiniÕ veršffentlicht, mit der er die erste Beschreibung einer systematischen Zergliederung der Menschenleiche seit der Zeit der PtolemŠer vorlegte. Hinsichtlich der Anatomie des Halses schreibt er, da§ — wenn man den longitudinalen Muskel abhebe — zwei DrŸsen sichtbar wŸrden. Diese DrŸsen, die er amigdalae nennt, lokalisiert er unter den larynx an die trachea. Die eine ihrer Funktionen sei, die trachea zu befeuchten; die andere, den Hals auszugleichen, und zwar deshalb, weil der Hals oben wegen der breiten larynx viel breiter, unten aber wegen der trachea schmaler sei. Hinzu kommt als dritte Funktion, die tiefen BlutgefЧe zu schŸtzen. — In den folgenden beiden Jahrhunderten wurde die ÔAnothomia MundiniÕ von den meisten Anatomen als Unterrichts-Grundlage benutzt, aber gerade bei den amigdalae folgte man ihr nicht, und zwar insofern, als man Mondinos DrŸsen an der Stelle der Tonsillen lokalisierte — und dies deshalb, weil nach Avicenna die amigdalae dort sein sollten. Erst Berengarius (Berengario da Carpi) hat in seinen umfangreichen ÔCommentaria super Anothomia MundiniÕ (1521) die Lage der DrŸsen im Sinne Mondinos bestŠtigt. Die Beschreibung entspricht exakt dem Befund, den ein moderner Anatom oder ein SchilddrŸsen-Chirurg vor sich hat, wenn er den Halsmuskel durchtrennt.

Aimilios D. Mavroudis: Der autographische Brief des K. G. KŸhn Ÿber die Edition der Reihe Medicorum Graecorum opera quae exstant (Band 87, S. 173)

In this article, an autograph letter by K. G. KŸhn (1754—1840) is being published and annotated. It was found glued on the interior surface of the back cover of No 25 manuscript kept at the University of Thessaloniki (Library of Department of Classics). With this letter KŸhn announced the publication of the series Medicorum Graecorum opera quae exstant to F. H. G. Donkermann ("Privatlehrer in Leiden") asking for his assistance to trace a Galenic manuscript at the Library of Leiden (most probably the pseudo-galenic treatise Peri sfugmwn pro Antwvnion filomaqh kai; filovsofon). Furthermore, in the same letter KŸhn mentioned the publication of the Galenic treatise Peri; ajrivsth didaskaliva, as an example (specimen) of the series that was going to follow.

Florian Mildenberger: Ein Zoologe auf Abwegen - Richard B. Goldschmidt als Sexualforscher und seine Rezeption im Dritten Reich (Band 85, S. 64)

At the beginning of 20th century, genetic research was carried out by many different branches of science. Biology, zoology, medicine, psychiatry, and psychology took part, so some results were a mixture of the involved sciences and not pure genetic.

               One researcher, who used his experiences from zoology to explain sexual orientation in the human race, was Richard B. Goldschmidt (1878—1958). He published several articles between 1916 and 1927 on this topic before he reconsidered his own theses. Greatest feedback he became during the Third Reich. Although being Jewish he became professor for life in autumn 1933. When he left Berlin for Berkeley in 1936, he began a new scientific career, leaving all old theories and ideologies behind. But his "UmwandlungsmŠnnchen"-theory was restarted by some German psychiatrists to explain homosexuality. One of these men was Theo Lang (1898—1957), who was allowed to publish his articles in the USA and in Switzerland. Lang had been one of the founders of the association of Nazi doctors and was a member of the SA. Moreover, after 1945 during Denazification he was allowed to call for Richard Goldschmidt as witness for his own defence.

Ferdinand Peter Moog: Zur "Hornissen-Spinne" des Pliniuis (Band 86, S. 220)

Pliny the Elder describes in his âNatural HistoryÔ XXIX 86 a species of spider dangerous for human beings and looking like a hornet without wings. This description corresponds to Solipugae of the genus Karschia, living in arid areas of Central Asia. These animals are not venomous but can cause harm by their powerful bite and in some cases by a following inflammation of the wound. On the contrary, an animal called "wasp-like", mentioned by Nikander of Kolophon (âTheriacaÔ, v. 738—746) and often regarded to be the same creature, seems to be a typical venomous spider which causes an acute intoxication by its bite.

Helmut Nieke: Die Folgen der Nichtbeachtung von Newtons Beugungsexperimenten (Band 85, S. 1)

In his diffraction experiments Newton described the phenomena of diffraction of light completely. From the transition of diffraction figures at the slit — from the inner diffraction fringes at short distance or large slit width to the outer fringes at great distance or small slit width — he concluded that light particles have an eel-like motion in this transitional area. Fresnel could only calculate border-line cases, with FourierÕs theorem and wave theory, but not the transition of inner to outer fringes at the slit. From 1850 on textbook authors ignored NewtonÕs diffraction experiments, because they were not able, even at that time, to justify them by calculation. Instead they only reported FresnelÕs border-line case, which they extrapolated inadmissably and wrongly to the slit itself.

               Even Bohr and Einstein did not consider NewtonÕs diffraction experiments. Because of that they could not discover the particle nature of light in difffraction. Therefore they used an incomplete basis and achieved an incomplete theory. Einstein criticized this incompleteness again and again, without being able to give reasons. Bohr tried to compensate for it with the Copenhagen interpretation.

               In 1966 Heisenberg deduced from his work a structure of the photon that can be interpreted as that of a vortex-pair. With this theory it was possible to justivy NewtonÕs experiments by calculation with the mechanics of deformable media, especially vortex mechanics — for the time being qualitatively. There results a new view of diffraction: a change of direction of photons instead of extinction. Diffraction takes place as the interaction of the structured photon with its returning field. The disregard of NewtonÕs diffraction experiments from 1850 and again from 1900 is described as a false direction taken by textbooks.

GŸnther Oestmann: John Flamsteeeds Horoskop fŸr die Grundsteinlegung der Sternwarte Greenwich (Band 86, S. 129)

The paper deals with the astronomical and astrological contents of a horoscope cast by John Flamsteed in 1675 for the foundation of Greenwich Observatory. So far no analysis of its astronomical contents has been made. It can be shown that the chart has been drawn correctly, as is to be expected from a competent astronomer. For calculating the planetary positions he most likely used tables issued by Johann Hecker, a pupil of Hevelius, based on KeplerÕs "Tabulae Rudolphinae" in 1627. The cusps of the twelve astrological houses Flamsteed calculated trigonometrically; so he used no table of houses. Flamsteed employed a method of house division (domification) which was commonly used in the 16th and 17th century and connected with the name of Johannes Regiomontanus. Positional circles joining in the north and south points of the observerÕs horizon are laid through distances of 30¡ on the celestial equator, thus giving unequal sections of the ecliptic.

               By consulting contemporary sources for the interpretation of the chart (RameseyÕs Astrologia Restaurata, 1653) it appears that the time for laying the foundation stone was well chosen from the astrological point of view. There were precursors in this practice, e.g. the Italian astrologer Luca Gaurico, who was commissioned to submit an astrological report for the foundation for the Farnese Wing in the Vatican in 1543, and Tycho Brahe, who performed a solemn ceremony on the island of Hven in 1576 at the laying of the foundation stone of his observatory in an astrologically propitious moment.

               This leads to the question whether Flamsteed believed in astrology. Michael Hunter has already given evidence that Flamsteed was indeed well-versed with astrological techniques and supplied astrologers with data. But at the same time he expressed hostility towards astrological interpretations issued frequently by different parties during Civil War in England. In an unpublished preface for HeckerÕs Tables (edited by Hunter) Flamsteed tried to show the "Vanity of Astrology, & the Practice of Astrologers". Therefore he cannot be taken as an ardent astrologer, although he was well acquainted with the art.

MichaelSachs: Die "Anatomischen Tabellen" (1722) des Johann Adam Kulmus (1689-1745). Ein Lehrbuch fŸr die (wund-)Šrztliche Ausbildung im deutschen Sprachraum und in Japan (Band 86, S. 69)

Although we can not find new diclosures or new ways of describing anatomical structures in the "Anatomischen Tabellen", a text-book written by Johann Adam Kulmus (1689–1745), it has had itÕs influence in the development of medicine, not only in Germany but in Japan. The "Anatomischen Tabellen" has been one of the most published anatomical text-books of the 18th century. This book was concepted by the medical doctor Kulmus, who was born in the German town Breslau and who was living in Danzig, especially to educate the apprentices and fellows of surgeons in german language. Therefore the book was equiped with sveral copper-plates for illustration.

During the years from 1722 to 1814 23 different editions were found, from those were 14 in german, 5 in latin and one each in french and netherland. Not one other anatomical textbooks of the 18th century has had such an abundance of editions. The disadvantage of the former used oversized anatomical atlases was their being published in latin and therefore they have been without any use and much too expensive for educational purposes for young surgeons.

The "Anatomischen Tabellen" has been the first occidental text-book of anatomy to be translated into japanese to be published in 1774, supplied with numerous wooden engravings.

Christine F. Salazar: Die Ohnmacht in der griechisch-ršmischen Medizin, insbesondere im traumatologisch-chirurgischen Umfeld (Band 85, S. 169)

Occurrences of fainting are very common in medical as well as non-medical literature; in order to restrict the field to a manageable size, this article focuses mainly on surgery and traumatology. An examination of the various passages suggests that there was considerable ambiguity associated with the concept of fainting. On the one hand it was seen as a common occurrence, to be expected in the context of wounds or surgery, but on the other it was also regarded as a life-threatening force in its own right.

Charlotte Schubert: Texte aus dem Geschlechterdiskurs: Catos Rede gegen die Aufhebung des Oppischen Luxusgesetzes (Liv. 34, 1,2-4,21) (Band 86, S. 93)

For the year 195 B.C. Livy (34,1,2–4,21) places a speech opposing the repeal of the Oppian luxury law in the mouth of Cato the Censor. Polar stylization of gender characterizations runs throughout his speech – this stylization and comparison with later laws, e.g., the Augustan laws on marriage, makes the question of literal authenticity irrelevant. Therefore in presenting this speech Livy brings together the concepts of social planning found in Augustan legislation and elements of gender characterization taken from discourses in the literary and philosophical circles of his time. It was already clear in the times of Livy and his readers that these elements could be arbitrarily chosen.

H. Stoffregen: Zwei frŸhe Fallbeschreibungen des adrenogenitalen Syndroms (Band 85, S. 138)

A number of studies in the history of endocrinology makes reference to two pediatric cases from the early 19th century which are commonly seen as containing the earliest descriptions of the adrenogenital syndrome substantiated by post-mortem findings. Their authors, in addition to being considered the first to furnish an exact description of the symptoms involved, are also occasionally credited with having been aware of the underlying causes of this disorder, i.e. the interaction between the adrenal cortex and the genitalia. The present study demonstrates that this opinion is not founded on facts. Furthermore, a retrospective analysis of the pathological details seemingly irreconcilable with this condition may in fact be explained as resulting from imperfect embryonic development.

Benedikt Konrad Vollmann: Auf dem Weg zur authentischen Hildegard. Bemerkungen zu den nur in der Florentiner ,PhysicaÔ-Handschrift Ÿberlieferten Texten (Band 87, S. 159)

The recently discovered ms. of HildegardÕs ,PhysicaÔ (Florence, B. Med.-Laurenz. Ashburnh. 1323) contains much more text than the Migne edition, based on Paris, BN. lat. 6952, does. Did the Florence ms. add or the Paris ms. omit? A comparison of all extant mss. and the editio princeps of 1533 reveals that the corpus of items and their order remain essentially the same, whereas the number of recipes and applications is in permanent decrease. We also observe an increasing reduction of explanatory remarks unique to HildegardÕs medical doctrine. The more copious text of the Florence ms. must, therefore, be regarded as authentic, and it should be made the base of a future edition of the ,PhysicaÔ.

Annette Wittkau-Horgby: "Unintended Consequences of Scientific Discoveries" Oder: Die "Heterogonie der Zwecke" als PhŠnomen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte (Band 85, S. 223)

This paper deals with an old observation in respect to manÕs action — the problem of unintended concequences of human action. It presents the scientific approaches to this phenomenon in the 18th century and focusses then on the problem of unintended concequences of scientific discoveries. Using the prominent examples of Copernicus and Darwin the author shows that the actual outcomes and final effects of scientific discoveries must not necessarily be the originally intended ones. On the contrary, especially those results of scientific discoveries which have affected the sphere of world view (Weltanschauung) like the research works of Copernicus and Darwin were originally meant to be only scientific studies. The final results in respect to the world view were on CopernicusÕ side not even realized and on DarwinÕs side neither intended nor wellcomed. The conclusion of this analysis is that due to the fact that both scientists did not have the intention to change the world view they can only partly be regarded to be responsible for the fundamental changes they finally caused.

Konstantina Zormbala: A Greek Geometry Textbook of the 19th Century: Influences of Mathematical Science on Axiomatic in School (Band 86, S. 198)

In diesem Artikel wird die Geometrie von Lacon, ein griechisches Geometrieschulbuch des 19. Jahrhunderts, untersucht. FŸr die neugriechische Schulbildung signalisiert dieses Buch den †bergang von der Periode der auslŠndischen bzw. deutschen und franzšsischen EinflŸsse zur Periode der eigenstŠndigen Entwicklung. Dies wird durch die  direkte Transformation des damaligen mathematischen, wissenschaftlichen Wissens zum Schulwissen gekennzeichnet. Unsere Analyse konzentriert sich auf das Axiomensystem von Lacons Schulgeometrie und beansprucht, die folgenden Fragen zu beantworten: 1) Welche mathematische GrŸnde haben Lacon zur Bildung dieses Axiomensystems gefŸhrt? 2) Welche EinflŸsse hat er bekommen? Es wird gezeigt, da§ Diskussionen der Zeit Ÿber die Behandlung von grundlegenden geometrischen Begriffen sowie auch mathematische Theorien (z.B. die von Hermann von Helmholtz und Wolfgang Bolyai) Lacon zur Bildung dieses Axiomensystems beeinflu§t haben.