Josep Aguiló-Regla (Hg.)

Logic, Argumentation and Interpretation / Lógica, Argumentación e Interpretación

Proceedings of the 22nd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Granada 2005. Vol. 5
Josep Aguiló-Regla (Hg.)

Logic, Argumentation and Interpretation / Lógica, Argumentación e Interpretación

Proceedings of the 22nd World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy in Granada 2005. Vol. 5

47,00 €*

Preise inkl. MwSt., ggf. zzgl. Versandkosten

Aktuell werden Bestellungen ausschließlich nach Deutschland geliefert. Falls Sie eine Lieferung außerhalb Deutschlands wünschen, nutzen Sie bitte unser Kontaktformular für eine Anfrage.

lieferbar in ca. 2-4 Werktagen

The volume is divided into five sections. In the first chapter entitled „Theory of argumentation“, contributors debate the idea of a rational modification of beliefs as the basis of rational consensus, the Günther-Alexy debate, Opocher’s conception of justice which is taken from a descriptive level to an argumentative one, truth in the field of rhetoric and judicial argumentation as well as sincerity as a necessary condition for effectiveness in legal argumentation.

Further sections deal with “Analysis and representation of arguments”, “Contextualized judicial arguments”, “Norms and interpretations” and finally a section on “Logic” with contributions on the stit theory and logic problems in the formalization and representation of legal knowledge in constructing an expert system.

Contents

I. Theory of Argumentation / Teoría de la argumentación:
José Manuel Cabra Apalategui: Discurso, racionalidad y persuasión
Peng-Hsiang Wang: Coherence and Revision. Critical Remarks on Günther-Alexy Debate
Maurizio Manzin: Justice, Argumentation and Truth in Legal Reasoning. In Memory of Enrico Opocher (1914–2004)
Federico Puppo: The Problem of Truth in Judicial Argumentation
C.E. Smith: Sincerity in Legal Argumentation Theory
II. Analysis and Representation of Argumentation /Análisis y representación de argumentos:
Eveline T. Feteris: The Rational Reconstruction of Teleological-Evaluative Arguments
Harm Kloosterhuis: Ad Absurdum Arguments in Legal Decisions
Günther Kreuzbauer: Visualization of Legal Argumentation
III. Contextualized Judicial Argumentation /Argumentación judicial contextualizada:
Marko Novak: Limiting Courts: Towards Greater Consistency of Adjudication in the Civil Law System
Sonia Esperanza Rodríguez Boente: Los principios generales del Derecho en la argumentación jurídica
Thomas da Rosa de Bustamante / Denis Franco Silva: Prospective Overruling: Why and How it Should be Applied (The example of the Brazilian Legal Systen)
Stanislovas Tomas: Theory of Judicial Shamanism
Derk Venema: Formalism and Non-formalism in Occupied Holland and Belgium 1940–1945
IV. Norms and Interpretation / Normas e interpretación:
Jaap Hage: Why Norms are not Imperatives
Raymundo Gama Leyva: Some ideas about the nature of presumption rules
Josep Aguiló-Regla: On presumptions and Legal Argumentation
Marijan Pavcnik: Constitutional Interpretation
V. Logic / Lógica
Mateusz Klinowski: Theory of Action on a Tree
José Pedro Úbeda Rives: Problemas que el Derecho plantea a la lógica

Reihe Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie – Beihefte
Band 110
ISBN 978-3-515-08914-2
Medientyp Buch - Kartoniert
Auflage 1.
Copyrightjahr 2007
Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag
Umfang 206 Seiten
Format 17,0 x 24,0 cm
Sprache Englisch, Spanisch